Friday, March 2, 2007

ART: Stories your’s and mine.

There were people from different walks of lives, even the almost stereotypical caricatures: flamboyant, drunk old men, proud, young and pretty muse apparitions, the calculative buyers, and the other worldly drifters. It was an evening for the celebration of art. It was as eventful as a social evening gets. When I left the premises I was reminded of a famous painter, Jatin Das’s words: “"Creativity is a transfer of energy".

I was left with a craving to script something after 48 hours of no sleep, truly energized by the exuberant creativity around me. But it also spawned the reflective questioning that ensued.

I was repeating to myself the usual artistic introspections and on the other hand I wondered about perceptions of art in a larger sense. I questioned: what it means to an artist, a artist, or me the artist: to exhibit. Art is personal; no artist would disagree. But all art seeks patronage and an audience. Exhibitionism somehow seemed antagonistic to the thesis of art being a personal tryst. One would agree that something heavy and wanting of expression within oneself drives the process of creation. Art sometimes is making sense, and hence sharing the knowledge produced becomes an exhibition. It is also a moment or pinnacle in occurrence which is not incidental but defining to the artist, exhibition then is a personal footnote on a dairy. I would go so far as saying that all art is crystallized, born in a moment of clarity or vision that makes it worth the effort of exhibiting.

There is a certain added dimension to what people have vaguely termed, ‘contemporary art’. Most contemporary art is a result of a lot of interrogation, internal, external and of regions between the two. Not to say that other traditional arts did not, contemporary art alone foregrounds this exploration. This form of art is meditation which does not culminate in the exhibition, but in fact carries forth the dialogic process that the artist begins for his own self. The artist’s personal dialog and the dialogue on the outside between the art and the viewer lend to multiplicities. To each it derives a satisfaction, maybe a personal catharsis too. Exhibiting then is an artist’s way of exposing a thought process, an experience that they find valuable, or a finding that is of occasion to them. I am speaking to you my thoughts like strokes on a painting seek to speak to you. Fortunately, words are malleable and so is art, to take on meanings and expressions that are diverse and at once fascinating.

6 comments:

Sanjeev Koppal said...

i never thought about why art needs an audience...

if there is no audience, does the art lose its meaning?

if God made the universe as her grand Painting, then without humans to appreciate it, is this world meaningless?

as i know someone would say 'hmmm'.

DhiRAj SinGh said...

I think art also has a very humble function: that of acting as an adjunct to memory... a sort of catalogue in symbols of the history of (human) experience.

mishmashed said...

This issue brings to mind a question: Arent exhibitionism and expression two different things?

If the goal of art were to express, would the artist not want an audience to listen? Then we can come to what an audience is. The audience could be inanimate or animate - but that is another issue.

Exhibitionism has a different sense to it - and you seem to be arguing that exhibitionism could be the pinnacle moment. Could successful expression not be a pinnacle moment?

Usha said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Usha said...

sanjeev: i am not posing existential questions about art. I am exploring grounds on which art becomes a means to convey an important argument, thought, even a process. Maybe the other way around is also true, meaning art which gets foregrounded by media or for other reasons gains this'importance'.
About meaning, i think its about being open to possibilities. Art with an audience creates multiple interpretations or meanings if you may. This is what i am interested in. Art in a closet doesnt fascinate me..

Usha said...

MAHARAJADHIRAJ: its interesting u call it adjunct. why so?
the art that narrates a tale maybe a catalogue of human experience, but that doesnt rule out what it could potentially transform into in the eyes of the gazer.
pavitra: hmmmmm
i thought i left expression out of the loop since i assumed it is a natural pre-cursor to the act of exhibiting. the moment of the birth of art is a pinncale to the artist-therefore the pinnacle is the expression itself or rather what precedes it.
all art is not meant for the audience, a lot of artists do seek to keep some works private. Here i am refering to art that opens to the audience. Yes,there are many kinds of audience-more than the 2 u mention, and shades in between.
Here I am hoping to spark what i call art contemplation or analysis rather than critic. Look out for my new blog on arts!