Sunday, February 11, 2007

My homeland, my country


Question: Are you a patriotic Indian?
Answer: I think that’s irrelevant. Yes I am Indian, it defines who I am, shapes my thoughts, but no I don’t think I feverishly worship my Indian roots. Patriotism is irrelevant whether Indian or any other.

Breeding specific country-based loyalty seems somehow misplaced in a largely migrant world (migrant is not just the physical state, but also our divided loyalties, multiplicities of beliefs and ‘globalized’ living conditions, in a sense we are all migrants one way or another). Let’s begin by understanding where this concept of a nation came from.

Nationalism was born probably in France, US, Russia before it reached all the colonized nations. The concept of nationalism was based on a shared past, customs, and history, or as Tagore calls it a “collective egoism”. The important thing to note is that nationalism is not something that existed and was ‘discovered’ but it is a construct like any other social or cultural tradition. Like the latter it thrives on narratives or stories.

Without going into the debates on origin or venture into: "who fathered the notion of nationalism?", lets veer back to the present. Is there still an umbilical cord that attaches us to our mother-land? Are we free of the almost irrational loyalty to a ‘country’ one calls ones own?

I think our sometimes conflicting loyalties to ‘international systems’ MNCs, WTO, UN have rendered nationalism irrelevant. For those who do not subscribe to loyalties of any of the above, nationalistic loyalty is still extraneous to commitment to a particular cause. For instance: humanitarian movements. There are political agendas(US, Iraq etc) which draw heavily on patriotism but it still remains to be seen if this is shared by large groups of the population outside these circles that stand to benefit directly from making these agendas.

In today’s age and time we can at best hope for pseudo expressions or dull echoes of what used to be a grand fervor. Nationalism is a white elephant, decorative for speeches and confined to museums.

PS: Like most of you reading this, I too grew up on faithful Indian history textbooks. I have also been through the phase of speeches, fervent slogans, even patriotic euphoria at cricket matches.

Picture Courtesy: perso.orange.fr

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

excellent piece!! it resonates with the sentiments of a few ppl who share ur view

AJ Nathen said...

Patriotism is the last refuge of the scoundrel - yeah , you took 300 -odd words to explain this in a subtle way ... good stuff :P

Sanjeev Koppal said...

i may have to differ here. *everything* we have is because we are free, and we are only free because those before us had this idea, called india.
maybe there are *kinds* of nationalism. there may be bad kinds and good kinds. i think supporting your cricket team is harmless, whereas wanting your country to destroy another is poison.

Amar Navuduri said...

hmmm i dont totally agree with your view..i think the sample you are using to base your opinion is very small..if you are referring to indians losing their sense of nationalism..then i can understand if you specifically say urban india which has been westernized or exposed to mncs etc..but not whole of india..80% of india(which is approx the non urban pop) still love india in the patriotic way..dont wanna elaborate on what exactly that feeling is..

On the other hand if you are genralizing this across the world..then i think it is very biased because all the population of all the countries in europe i thnk are very patriotic and devoted to the country's cause except again for minorities

So all in all...i think in the current worlds context..patriotism and nationalism are very relevant ideas and except for a minor cosmopolitan population across the world, these feelings still exist and I think they exist for the good.

Usha said...

I was anticipating this-sentimental patriotic reactions!
I do not expect my point to be true for the whole world neither the whole of India..how boring if we all thought the same!
It was a personal question i posed to myself and answered as u can see in the beginning of the post.
Amar: I think 80% is a stretch by miles. Maybe a handful of people feel that way but looking at 'Rang De Basanti' and being stirred by emotion is not a reflection of a majority of India being patriotic. Its a fleeting emotion.
If thats not the guage then what are u basing ur argument on? I myself doubt there are any such strong identities rooted especially in the populations that i have encountered. I am projecting this doubt on to the rest.

Sanjeev: The argument is not about the good or bad of patriotism. And yes at the point of independence we needed the umbrella of a 'nation', but i think we need to grow out of it. Again personal belief.

Anonymous said...

Nationalism is a white elephant, decorative for speeches and confined to museums.

I fully agree with that. But won't you agree with me that it will be suicidal for some one to give up on their mother culture, even if mother culture has few bad aspects in it.

If we do that then it will be like throwing out the baby with the bath water. Won’t you agree?

http://www.amiahindu.com/